Critical analysis of a Quality Master

Are the quality assurance ideas and methodologies introduced by the Masters of Quality still relevant?

Developed decades ago, are they still applicable to modern business, especially with the development of

e-commerce based businesses?

For this assignment, pick one of the Quality Masters and critically analyze whether the principles they

introduced are still relevant today. Provide an overview of one of their main idea(s), describe the

strengths and weaknesses of their main idea(s) then offer an analysis of why you agree or disagree that

their idea(s) are still important to modern organizations.

1. Select one of the following Quality Masters:

Edward Deming

Joseph Juran

Walter Shewhart

Philip Crosby

Kaoru (Karoru) Ishikawa

Genichi Taguchi

Armand Feigenbaum

2. Your analysis must address:

Overview of their main idea(s)

Strengths and Weaknesses of their main idea(s)

Agree/Disagree Analysis

3. Your essay will be judged on:

Overall appearance (grammar, logical flow)

Bibliography of supporting articles (References must be directly cited in your analysis

see handout for details)

4. Your analysis must be 3 full pages minimum to 4 full pages maximum, excluding a supporting

bibliography of a minimum of 3 to a maximum of 4 references. 12 font, single spaced.

5. Hint: Most assignments that do well will have a structure Having headings relevant to the

grading criteria or an introduction/main analysis/conclusion will ensure you cover all the topics

and can organize your thoughts logically.

Grading Criteria (note that grading is roughly equivalent to effort in each section):

Overview of main idea(s) 10%

Strengths and Weaknesses 30%

Agree/Disagree Analysis 40%

Overall Appearance 10%

Bibliography 10%

Total Grade: 100%