F I L M

Movies under Hitler: between propaganda and distractionMore than 1,000 movies were produced during the Nazi era from 1933-1945. In his film "Hitler's Hollywood," journalistRüdiger Suchsland took a close at these works.

DW: When it comes to German films produced between 1933-1945, one automatically thinks of propaganda films. But among the 1,000movies that were made in Germany during that period, didn't real propaganda films only form a small part of the entire production?

Rüdiger Suchsland: Yes, when you consider pure propaganda films. However, in a way, basically all of these films were propaganda. After all,there was no unpolitical, innocent film production back then.

Even films by directors like Peter Pewas and Helmut Käutner, who definitely were no Nazis and even distanced themselves from them,somehow worked in the shadow of the regime, as they were forced to submit their works to censorship already at the screenplay-stage.Goebbels watched them all.

Goebbels also watched Helmut Käutner's "Under the Bridges," which is usually seen as a resistance film, or one on deserting. And he evenliked it. After all, Goebbels did understand a few things about film. He didn't think, however, that showing "Under the Bridges" was politicallysuitable. And that's why it wasn't shown.

Advertisement

TOP STORIES / CULTURE / FILM

We use cookies to improve our service for you. You can find more information in our data protection declaration. More info OK

Films like "Two in a Big City" (1942) were intended todistract people from the war

Ilse Werner, starring in Helmut Käutner's "Great FreedomNo. 7" (1944). The film is filled with resignation andmelancholy

Sports offered another distraction in the 1942 box office hit"The Big Game"

To some extent, therefore, all directors were exposed to these scissors in their heads. The filmmakers knew very well that they were to presenttheir finished works. They knew that they had to justify them. And in the worst case, this would have consequences for them, including life-threatening ones. That means, all of these films were somewhat contaminated by ideology.

Entertainment films also played a big role. How did the Nazis exploit this?

Entertainment films were also controlled by the regime. After all, the Nazis made use ofthe media in order to communicate with the population. These well-known massevents were only a small part of these efforts. Radio and cinema enabled the regime toreach out to large groups of people, including those who didn't read newspapers, letalone books like "Mein Kampf." But such people did watch films. They went to themovies mainly because of popular stars.

We know of many Jewish citizens in Germany and Austria, and of many resistancefighters who rejected the Nazi ideology, who nevertheless watched these movies. Part ofthese presentations were the highly ideologized weekly reviews that were controlled by

Goebbels, as well as the so-called "culture films." These were highly contorted works posing as documentaries. But people had no choice but towatch them, if they wanted to see their beloved stars like Zarah Leander and Heinz Rühmann.

Another objective of filmmaking, certainly during the last years of war, was to divertpeople's attention.

Exactly. Right from the beginning, many films were produced with the aim ofdistracting people. An interesting fact is that right after the Nazis came to power, somedirectors pressed ahead to produce super regime propaganda films – some of them out ofsheer opportunism, others because they believed in the ideology. That's when films like"Hans Westmar. One of many. A German Fate from the Year 1929" and "HitlerjungeQuex" [Eds. Hitler Youth Quex, also shown in the US under the title "Our Flag Leads UsForward"] were produced. But Goebbels rejected some of these films, finding them tooblunt.

The real art consisted of presenting the Nazi ideology in a more subtle way. It was aboutinstilling the ideology into people like some medicine that you don't taste. And it was about diverting their attention with illusions. These wereillusion films making use of theater stages. The films starring Marika Rökk are a good example.

These films would actually often be set in the past.

Yes, these films moved around in historical spheres with fluent transitions between the reality in the plot and the dreams of the characters,their fantasies and fears. These distinctions were so fluent that viewers had a hard time distinguishing between the dreams of the protagonistand the real action of the film. 

I would go so far as to claim that these films were all about precisely those transitions. The viewers were to take along what they watched onthe screen into their reality, and they were to see their own reality as a continuation of film with other means. They were to confuse reality anddream, truth and fantasy, without being able to perceive the difference anymore.

Your film starts with clips of "Morgenrot" from 1933, which is a patriotic U-boatdrama directed by Gustav Ucicky, and we are informed that the production of thisfilm already started before the Nazis came to power. Why is that so important?

Well, the Nazis didn't fall from the sky in 1933. There wasn't a sudden change, butrather a rough transition. There was no hour zero; the Nazis' views werealready reflected in film and in real society before they came to power. They becamestronger and stronger, and that was also reflected in films and UFA productions. AlfredHugenberg, who controlled the UFA Studios, was often seen as somebody who easedthe Nazis' way in.

Just as there were leftist and a communist films in the Weimar Republic, there werealso right-wing and revanchist ones, as well as nationalistic and fascist films. Some of them were also celebrating Germany's lost monarchy.

We use cookies to improve our service for you. You can find more information in our data protection declaration. More info OK

Film critic and director Rüdiger Suchsland

A musical comedy: Käutner's "We Make Music" (1942),starring Ilse Werner and Georg Thomalla

The films starring  Otto-Gebühr as Frederich the Great, the U-boat films, as well as films featuring the stab-in-the-back myth [Eds. a widelybelieved conspiracy theory in German right-wing circles after World War I] are good examples of these trends. 

Even years later, after World War II, there wasn't a real break in filmmaking. Did this phenomenon repeat itself in a different version?

After 1945, there wasn't an hour zero for German film either - even less than in German society. There were so-called transition films, whichhad been produced during the Nazi era. There was some continuity. Directors like Veit Harlan who did "Jud Süß" [Süss the Jew] andWolfgang Liebeneiner continued to make films.

Liebeneiner is a particularly interesting case. In 1943, he shot "Melody of a Great City," and was later seen as a proponent of disengagement,in a way. 

On the other hand, he also directed one of the worse "Vorbehaltsfilm" [Eds. a list of reserved films, predominantly Nazi propagandaglorifying war or promoting racism, which can only be shown under particular conditions for educational and researchpurposes]. Liebeneier's film "I accuse" from 1941 served as a justification of euthanasia, embellished it, claiming that the assassination ofhandicapped people could be justified by drawing an analogy to assisted suicide.

Roughly 40 films produced between 1933 and 1945 are now classified as "reservedfilms." What's your view on this? Is that categorization still valid?

This list of "reserved films" is of course an issue I wanted to indirectly tackle in my film aswell. Some years ago, Felix von Moeller shot an excellent film on that topic called"Verbotene Filme" (Forbidden films). I don't like the title, as it implies that these filmswere really forbidden, which isn't true - we are free to watch everything. However, these40 films may only be watched under certain conditions.

When watching some of them, like "I accuse" for example, or "Jud Süß," one understandsthat there are good reasons for listing them. These films are evil and hard to understand.When people watch them without knowing what they're about, especially uninformed viewers, it's not that they'll become Nazis right afterseeing them, but these films are dangerous because people hardly notice that they are being influenced morally, politically and aesthetically.

Besides these films, are there any other examples of highly problematic works of theNazi era?

Most of these "Vorbehaltsfilme" are sensationalist war films. Looking at themnowadays, people would rather laugh seeing how primitive they were. Therefore, I don'tbelieve that most of them are really dangerous. But I also believe that one shouldconsider that there are quite a few films that are freely distributed [Eds.: on DVD,outside of Germany, on Youtube] that are much more dangerous than some of thereserved films, because they are more subtle, less blunt. For example, I see films likeVeit Harlan's "Covered Tracks" (1938) as much worse. That film is infamous in that itjustifies denunciation and police surveillance, a dictatorial kind of surveillance, whilesuggesting some sort of submission to the audience.

Rüdiger Suchsland's documentary "Hitler's Hollywood" will hit German movie theaters in Germany on February 23.

D W R E C O M M E N D S

'A German Life' film met Goebbels' secretaryMany decades ago, Brunhilde Pomsel was Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels' personal stenographer. She has passed away at age 106. She hadrecently agreed to be interviewed for the film "A German Life." (30.01.2017)  

Secretary to Nazi propaganda minister Goebbels dies at 106A former secretary to Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels has died, aged 106. Brunhilde Pomsel was one of the last remaining people who knewmembers of the Nazi leadership in person. (30.01.2017)  

How stickers are used for propagandaWe use cookies to improve our service for you. You can find more information in our data protection declaration. More info OK

Practically every kid has collected stickers at some point. But they aren't just fun and games. An exhibition in the German Historical Museum in Berlinshows how stickers have been used for political purposes. (21.04.2016)  

We use cookies to improve our service for you. You can find more information in our data protection declaration. More info OK