: An Investigation of Metadata Interoperability Issues in Digital Libraries and Potential Corrective Strategies in the Context of Catalogue Sharing Among UK University Libraries. revise the paper(rm)and pay attention to
q3 Would require substantial background research before it could be answered well

Need to cite broad statements you frequently use as topic sentences.

Significance: I’m still not sure this is such an issue as you’re basically describing crosswalks.

Review use of et al. APA

Lack of critical analysis in reviews of articles; need to concretely link articles to RQ, A&I, etc.

In general, your writing is overly verbose, resulting in additional, but largely unneeded length. Challenge yourself to try to get to the point using less words.
______
I donot want empirical studies rather I ant 3 additional references that I can add them to the lit review section for that I will upload second paper (: An Investigation of Metadata Interoperability Issues in Digital Libraries and Potential Corrective Strategies in the Context of Catalogue Sharing Among UK University Libraries)
so I want the paper be in line with the files
(rm)revise it again and correct mistakes)
: An Investigation of Metadata Interoperability Issues in Digital Libraries and Potential Corrective Strategies in the Context of Catalogue Sharing Among UK University Libraries file has lit I need 3 additional references that be in line with the lit in there.
so your paper will has
Introduction
•Aims and objectives
•Research questions(the same questions in (: An Investigation of Metadata Interoperability Issues in Digital Libraries and Potential Corrective Strategies in the Context of Catalogue Sharing Among UK University Libraries) but add third one.
Introduction
•Aims and objectives
•Research questions
•Significance
•Literature review