Hi
I have project (Comprehensive Literature Review project) � final report + Reflection
The topic is Research - Information Literacy research of Annmaree Lloyd
Annmaree Lloyd: has profile in google which
https://anniemlloyd.com/
The important points:
1- I have done the project brief (Plan) you have to have a look on this to do the report. �find the (project brief (plan) + feedback from supervisor) �attached.
2- I have done the annotated bibliography + search strategy �please find (annotated bibliography + Feedback)� attached. Please see the feedback from supervisor and work on it.
3- I want you to write final report + Reflection maximum 10000 words by following the structure (requirements) �find the (structure + criteria) file attached.
Note: you have to follow the brief any change is unacceptable. Please follow the brief.
The words limited is 10000 words or less NO MORE
4- No plagiarism.
have done every thing but need to be organised
literature review need add some recent reference - impractical research papered
reorganized - data analysis and discussion chapters only
page 101 - 113 demographic if you check how strong and explained enough
need to be restructuring the table of content
data analysis and discussion chapters
and write the conclusion and recommendations
page 112 - 143 qualitative analysis still i'm working on this part - if you can improve it
find Scatterplot on some part specially on usage of TPACK and deterrent between Saudi Arabia and Australia
create 3 figures models
1- compare between saudi and australia
2- factors to improve usage of ICT in education
3- what ever do you think necessary
150- to the end - students and teachers data analysis and discussion - conclusion need some work and more reorganizing
check tables of content - table numbers and references style and correcting grammar, punctuation, spelling, repeated words, and referencing accura
I would like to work closely with you to refine my dissertation for completion in 30 to 60 days (my draft is 90 pages with references, when we add the final chapters, probably btw 100 to 125 pages.
My advisors would like me to focus on three of the 16 students (lowest, middle and highest performance on the tests and questionnaires and audio recordings) and do mini case studies of how they responded.
Research questions: How do students respond to different multi-dimensional learning materials in dissection activities?
Can virtual dissections/#D instruction enhance their engagement w/science dissections? (How they thought they took advantage of the different media in each condition with paper,live frog and virtual dissections?) Reframing: Can various forms of 3D instruction motivate / learning,
Add social learning theories of: Branford & Schwartz, Vygotsky on scaffolding, proximal development (3D theorists), Piaget on children and three dimensional learning, Howard Gardner,
Dear writer,
Thank you for you last writing.
There is another one. Please make sure follow the instruction that I offered.
And is any chance I can receive your work by 21/10. I really really appreciate your help.
I have project (Comprehensive Literature Review project) � final report + Reflection
The topic is Research - Information Literacy research of Annmaree Lloyd
Annmaree Lloyd: has profile in google which
https://anniemlloyd.com/
The important points:
1- I have done the project brief (Plan) you have to have a look on this to do the report. �find the (project brief (plan) + feedback from supervisor) �attached.
2- I have done the annotated bibliography + search strategy �please find (annotated bibliography + Feedback)� attached. Please see the feedback from supervisor and work on it.
3- I want you to write final report + Reflection maximum 10000 words by following the structure (requirements) �find the (structure + criteria) file attached.
Note: you have to follow the brief any change is unacceptable. Please follow the brief.
The words limited is 10000 words or less NO MORE
4- No plagiarism.
5- A
I am asking for this writer please 369039. Since he is familiar with my research study and he did two questions for me and this is my last question to pass my exam. The writer writing style should be the same in all the three questions I will answer so I will pass the exam since I won't be questioned by my prof why this paper is different in style than the other two one this writer did for me. So, I am insisting please to have the same writer for the previous two orders. The writer ID is
369039.I am asking you to write me 4 pages only for this order so please take it. Please look at the file I uploaded. It has all the instructions for this order. Thanks.
Find a standardized education or psychological test in one of the Buros Mental Measurements Yearbooks and write a clear, thorough review and evaluation. You may chose any test that interests you as long as the review provides enough validity and reliability information, good or bad, for the reviewer to make a legitimate evaluation. That means that it will have at least two specific types of data evaluated for each. This should be a straight-forward assignment since you are primarily summarizing a review already conducted by experts. You simply have to understand and synthesize (put into your own thoughts and words) what they have already determined. If the test you selected has been evaluated by more that one reviewer, you can use information from both reviews at your discretion. Be sure to include your thoughts/conclusions for the validity, reliability and overall impressions sections.
Order Description
I am ordering chapter 4 (results) and chapter 5 (discussion). I will attach chapters 1-3, raw data (statistical tests have not been run).
The data will be presented in four files however all the data pertains to the same time period and persons. The data has dummy ids and each file contains the same dummy ids across files:
-A student will keep the same DummyID throughout all the data, enabling you to link data items
-On the Demographics Tab, there is one row per student per year. The BirthDate will allow you to calculate student age at any point in time
-On the EntryWithdrawalTab, there may be more than one row per student per year, depending on whether the student moved school/district during that year
-The other three tabs provide the meanings of the codes
Chapter 4:
The statistical tests needed and expectations for chapter 4 are laid out in chapter 3.
Chapter 5:
Must contain policy recommendations. The recommendations can and should include expan
Assignment;
posts by adding additional support to a colleague�s perspective or by introducing a different perspective on the colleague�s environmental scan findings and SWOT Analysis. In addition, explain whether you agree with the colleagues� decisions to adapt or not adapt their technology goals.
Original Technology Goal:
Posts.
Purchase, upgrade and enhance technology resources on the Grand City University campus to execute the five-year plan, supporting the institution�s new Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematic (STEM) programs by providing industrial resources which aim to enhance student learning in the field.
As I conducted the environmental scan, I found my technology goal was loosely aligned with what Grand City University leadership seeks. My goal aimed to increase student participation in STEM education programs with the use of enhanced technology to support the new programs. My environmental scan revealed the importance of embracing technology as a mean
