+1(316)4441378

+44-141-628-6690


Warning: Use of undefined constant woothemes - assumed 'woothemes' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/admin/web/qualityessayresearch.com/public_html/wp-content/themes/cushy/archive.php on line 47
Archive for the ‘Psychology’
Warning: Use of undefined constant woothemes - assumed 'woothemes' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/admin/web/qualityessayresearch.com/public_html/wp-content/themes/cushy/archive.php on line 47
Category

Public Health And Health Care Overview

The purpose of this assignment is to compare and contrast the different ways two disciplines, public health and health care, address a public health issue. You will use the Public Health and Health Care Table Excel file (linked in Resources) to complete this assignment. Note: Tobacco was used as an example of a public health issue in the template. You must select a different issue.

Obesity As A Public Health Issue

Search for obesity epidemic on YouTube and choose two results to view.

Briefly summarize the two choices you examined.

What were the major points made in each video?

What really got your attention and moved you the most? Why?

What more did you want to know?

Refer to the APA manual or the EasyBib Web site (linked in Resources) for direction on citing video presentations if necessary

Executive Brief Report Of Benjamin “Tony” Atkins

Describe the personality disorder of the individual that you have chosen as a basis for your executive briefing report. Briefly introduce the individual's background and identify him or her as either psychopathic or sociopathic. Describe his or her personality traits that relate to either psychopathy or sociopathy. Explain what distinguishes the individual as being a psychopath or sociopath instead of the alternative.


Submit assignment as a Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins.

Discussion Board

  • Describe the main differences between Concrete Operations versus Formal Operations (minimum 1-2 paragraphs)
  • Describe the main differences between Metacognition versus Epistemic Cognition (minimum 1-2 paragraphs)

Please feel free to refer to the material found in your textbook, as well as refer to any journals or scholarly articles that will be of assistance in answering the questions. Please be sure to cite the material you have gathered from your textbook or other sources and to use APA Style formatting.

Theories And Theorists

 

Each of the different fields of study is heavily influenced by theories and theorists that you have been learning about throughout your courses. You have learned about various theories of leadership such as transformational or transactional leadership, and a few of the impactful psychological theorists such as Erikson and Freud. 

For this assignment, select a contemporary challenge in your field (Criminalolgy/Forensic Psychology (current within the last five or so years) and in a 2,800-word (8-page) paper, evaluate the challenge. The evaluation of the issues should include the following:

  • Describe the contemporary challenge. 
  • Apply three theories to evaluate the issue.
  • Critically analyze the application of the theories.
  • Recommend a solution based on the theoretical analysis. 

Utilize a minimum of 10 academic resources.

Causes And Effects

In 2-3 pages, respond to the following:

  1. Identify the four causes and effects you have selected to incorporate into an integrated critical analysis narrative.  
  2. Write an integrated critical analysis narrative that incorporates the four causes and effects you identified.  
  3. Explain your reaction to the results of your critical analysis. Could these causes have been prevented? Which one do you think was most important in leading to the problem?

877025

For this assignment, you will write the psychological report Using the Sample Report as a format guide, construct a psychological report with a referral question, incorporating Franks Psychosocial History and MSE located under additional resources. These are raw materials to incorporate into your report. If you feel some points need elaboration or clarification feel free to do an imaginary interview with Frank and incorporate additional information.   For the Test Results section of your report, review and interpret the WAIS-IV protocol that is located under the additional resources tab.  Conclude your paper with diagnostic impressions and summary/recommendations.
 

Please refer to the following materials located under additional resources to help you complete this assignment: WAIS-IV Results, WAIS-IV PowerPoint, Psych Report Writing, and Sample Report.  You will need to review and interpret the WAIS-IV protocols for

Literature Review Draft

 

  • Literature Review Draft
    Preparation
    In addition to the other helpful links provided in Resources, we recommend you use an organizing tool from the Capella University Library Services and Tools page, such as the Scholarly Research Log, to help you track the theories, methods, and findings of the articles you have read.
    Note: Be sure to post your draft of the literature review in the Unit 4 discussion and incorporate feedback from your instructor and peers before submitting this assignment.
    Instructions
    For this assignment, submit the current draft of your literature review for instructor feedback and grading. Using your literature search question (LSQ), the annotated bibliography, and the abstracted outline to support your review, identify themes that emerge from your analysis of what we know so far about your topic. Use these themes to describe how your research builds on prior knowledge.
    For instance, if your LSQ is

Statement Of Problem, RQ Development, And Significance Of Proposed Study

 

Statement of Problem, RQ Development, and Significance of Proposed Study

This discussion has three parts. You will be asked to articulate the need for your study, known as the research problem and include a draft of your research question (RQ) as well as the potential significance of the research. As we have discussed, it is the job of the scientific investigator to identify new areas of inquiry and ways to gain new knowledge in these areas. Research questions are used by scientists to frame potential areas of inquiry. 

But before developing a research question, the research problem must be identified and justified. To justify the research question, scientists will consider the implications of the problem for those who have a stake in the results of the investigation. The significance of the findings will be presented to the stakeholders and sponsors of the investigation.

Your task is to consider what you have learned as

Draft Chapter 2

 

Draft Chapter 2

Reminder: You will incorporate feedback you receive during this discussion into your Unit 5 assignment submission.

Timing is critical. If you can, post earlythe earlier you post, the more time your instructor and peers will have to provide feedback and give you the opportunity to improve your literature review submission.

  • Submit a draft of your literature review for peer and instructor feedback.
  • You will receive feedback and suggestions to improve the draft in responses to your post.
  • Integrate instructor and peer feedback into a revised literature review before submitting your assignment for grading.

Note: Expect to revise the literature review document multiple times prior to incorporating it into the final project, which you will submit in Unit 10 as Chapter 2 of the Integrative Project. 

Upload your literature review as a Word document. In addition,