Consideration does not have to be adequate or commercially realistic, nor does it have to be expressed in monetary terms, it merel needs to be suflicient".
Consideration does not have to be adequate or commercially realistic, nor does it have to be expressed in monetary terms, it merel needs to be suflicient”. Discuss the accuracy of this statement.
Your answer should include a detailed explanation of “nominal”
consideration and “suflicient” consideration and how these legal concepts interact in cases like William v Roffey Bros & Nicholls
(Contractors) Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1.
Your assignment should also discuss whether Australian contract law should (or should not) provide greater
clarity as to what is (or is not) sufficient consideration.
The assignment must include footnotes, a bibliography and a synopsis.
The assignment must be printed on one side only of A4 paper with 1.5 or double spacing.
The references used must be of relevance to Australian
Law.
ORDER THIS ESSAY HERE NOW AND GET A DISCOUNT !!!
You can place an order similar to this with us. You are assured of an authentic custom paper delivered within the given deadline besides our 24/7 customer support all through.
Latest completed orders:
# | topic title | discipline | academic level | pages | delivered |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6
|
Writer's choice
|
Business
|
University
|
2
|
1 hour 32 min
|
7
|
Wise Approach to
|
Philosophy
|
College
|
2
|
2 hours 19 min
|
8
|
1980's and 1990
|
History
|
College
|
3
|
2 hours 20 min
|
9
|
pick the best topic
|
Finance
|
School
|
2
|
2 hours 27 min
|
10
|
finance for leisure
|
Finance
|
University
|
12
|
2 hours 36 min
|