Garrett Hardin's "The Tragedy of the Commons."

Garrett Hardin’s “The Tragedy of the Commons.”
This essay involves a reading reading of Garrett Hardin’s “The Tragedy of the Commons”

1.first identify what you consider the most important or interesting (or controversial, or wrong-headed) concept,assertion, argument, or conclusion in Hardin’s text.
2. Next, for the item you selected, please post a well-organized message that addresses all the following questions about the item’s context within
Hardin’s text, your evaluation of Hardin’s discussion of the item, and your reflective conclusions about the item’s significance.
IDENTIFICATION OF CONTEXT:
* What is the item that you selected?
* What is the context of Hardin’s discussion of this item — what purposes was Hardin’s discussion of it supposed to achieve?
* What are the crucial passages in the text where Hardin discusses your item with the most clarity or depth? Please quote short passages and crucial
parts of longer passages.
* What are the most important claims that Hardin makes about your item?

EVALUATION:
* How clear is Hardin’s discussions of your item?
* Are there important questions that Hardin fails to address or addresses poorly? What else would Hardin have to explain to make his discussion
of your item crystal-clear?
* Does Hardin’s discussion of your item allow him to reach the goal or purpose you have identified? If so, what are the most effective things he does
to achieve his purpose? If not, what are the most significant weaknesses in Hardin’s discussion?

REFLECTIVE CONCLUSIONS:
* Does Hardin’s discussion of your item lead to important conclusions, questions, or calls to action?
* Are there any interesting or important connections between Hardin’s discussion of your item relate to ideas in authors like Gardiner, Sawin and Hughes, Kates?
* Does Hardin’s discussion of your item have any practical significance for your life or for your relationship to or use of technology? Please quote short passages and crucial
parts of longer passages.
* What are the most important claims that Sandel makes about your item?

EVALUATION:
* How clear is Sandel’s discussions of your item?
* Are there important questions that Sandel fails to address or addresses poorly? What else would Sandel have to explain to make his discussion of your
item crystal-clear?
* Does Sandel’s discussion of your item allow him to reach the goal or purpose you have identified? If so, what are the most effective things he does to
achieve his purpose? If not, what are the most significant weaknesses in Sandel’s discussion?

REFLECTIVE CONCLUSIONS:
* Does Sandel’s discussion of your item lead to important conclusions, questions, or calls to action?
* Are there any interesting or important connections between Sandel’s discussion of your item relate to ideas in Silver, Kass, Cummings, or in the other
authors?
* Does Sandel’s discussion of your item have any practical significance for your life or for your relationship to or use of technology?
Please no more than two pages in length One source can be found in Society, Ethics and Technology, Fourth Edition Morton E. Winston and Ralph D. Edelbach PP.329

 

 

ORDER THIS ESSAY HERE NOW AND GET A DISCOUNT !!!

 

You can place an order similar to this with us. You are assured of an authentic custom paper delivered within the given deadline besides our 24/7 customer support all through.

 

[order_calculator]