Living with a Nuclear Iran

analysis; http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/09/living-with-a-nuclear-iran/308193/?single_page=true

State, as accurately as possible, author’s intent in writing article

What is the author’s goal?

Purpose well-stated or clearly implied?

Could author have a hidden agenda?

Key Question

What is key questionnaire Author is addressing?

Question well-stated?

Clear & unbiased?

Does expression of question do justice to complexity of issue?

Question & purpose directly relevant to each other?

Information

Does auth. Cite relevant evidence, experiences, &/or info essential to issue?

Info accurate & taken from credible sources?

Data anecdotal or systematic?

Relevant?

Address complexities of issue?

Concepts

Most important concepts, theories, or ideas needed to understand & solve problem?

How auth. Defines these?

What auth. Means by these?

Assumptions

What assum. Auth. Taking for granted, that is, generalizations the auth. Does not defend in the context of the article?

Does auth use questionable assum., that is, assum. That can be — or ought to be — challenged?

Inferences & Conclusions

Concl. Clearly follow from info provided by auth?

Unjustifiable?

Are alternative concl.s considered particularly where the issue is complex?

Is line of reasoning sound, logical?

Point of View

What auth is looking at & how he/she sees it?

Does auth show sensitivity to alternative relevant p.o.v. or lines of reasoning?

Does auth consider & respond to objections framed from other relevant p.o.v.?

Implications

If we fail to accept line of reasoning, what are consequences & how should we act?

If we accept l.o.r., what are conseq. & how should we act?

What are the implications of the implic.s?

ORDER THIS ESSAY HERE NOW AND GET A DISCOUNT !!!

 

You can place an order similar to this with us. You are assured of an authentic custom paper delivered within the given deadline besides our 24/7 customer support all through.

 

[order_calculator]