+1(316)4441378

+44-141-628-6690

March22BBA211CrossCulturalMakeupFinal1.docx

BBA211 Cross Cultural Business Issues Task brief & rubrics

Assignment:

You are an executive assistant for a manager of a cosmetics company based in the USA. The company is considering expanding its operations and opening a branch in China and you have been asked to write a report looking at cultural working differences between the USA and China.

Referring to Hofstede’s dimensions and their effect on working practices, write a report about potential problems that could arise between staff from the two countries working together.

Suggested source:

Hofstede, G.; Hofstede, G.J. & Minkov, M. 2010. Cultures and Organisations. New York: McGraw Hill

Formalities:

· Report style (sections, headings – introduction, findings, analysis, etc.)

· Wordcount: 1300

· Font: Arial 12 pts.

· The in-text References and the Bibliography must be in Harvard’s citation style.

Weighting: 60%

Submission:

The following learning outcomes will be assessed:

· Ability to select and present relevant findings in a concise written style according to word count

· Ability to analyse and interpretate evidence (eg. evaluating consequences, implications)

· Referencing following Harvard conventions (reference list and in text quotation or paraphrasing)

Rubrics

Exceptional 90-100

Good 80-89

Fair 70-79

Marginal fail 60-69

Knowledge & Understanding (35%)

Student demonstrates excellent understanding of key concepts and uses vocabulary in an entirely appropriate manner.

Student demonstrates good understanding of the task and mentions some relevant concepts and demonstrates use of the relevant vocabulary.

Student understands the task and provides minimum theory and/or some use of vocabulary.

Student understands the task and attempts to answer the question but does not mention key concepts or uses minimum amount of relevant vocabulary.

Critical Thinking (35%)

Student critically assesses in excellent ways, drawing outstanding conclusions from relevant authors.

Student critically assesses in good ways, drawing conclusions from relevant authors.

Student provides some insights but stays on the surface of the topic with mainly descriptive writing.

Student makes little or no critical thinking insights.

Communication (30%)

Student communicates ideas extremely clearly with excellent use of grammar and organization of ideas (cohesion, headings, etc). All sources are referenced and/or paraphrased correctly in text and as a list.

Student communicates ideas clearly with good use of grammar and organization of ideas (cohesion, headings, etc). Sources are mostly referenced correctly in text and as a list.

Student communicates ideas with some clarity, but with some questionable use of grammar and organization. Sources referenced with some errors.

Student communicates ideas in an unclear and unconcise way with language and organization that affects the message. Sources referenced with many errors in text and in the list.

 

You can place an order similar to this with us. You are assured of an authentic custom paper delivered within the given deadline besides our 24/7 customer support all through.

 

Latest completed orders:

# topic title discipline academic level pages delivered
6
Writer's choice
Business
University
2
1 hour 32 min
7
Wise Approach to
Philosophy
College
2
2 hours 19 min
8
1980's and 1990
History
College
3
2 hours 20 min
9
pick the best topic
Finance
School
2
2 hours 27 min
10
finance for leisure
Finance
University
12
2 hours 36 min
[order_calculator]