Percentage of Course: 30% (100 marks)
Question 1: (60 marks)
Discuss whether you think women are more mobile today than in the past and whether this is a positive
turn of events. To answer this question, you will need to explain the concept of mobility by explaining
how it has been changed by
a) globalization;
b) international inequities;
c) migration; and
d) changes in organization of work and public private spaces.
Suggested source readings that you could use to answer this question:
Dart, Ponzanesi, Dirty Pretty Things, Neil and Nies, Hanson, Barndt, Sassen, Enloe
Melissa Gilbert for mobility
(Suggested length for Question 1: 4 pages 10-12 pt font double-spaced; longer answers acceptable
within reason)
An A answer will include the following:
- a good explanation of the concept of mobility and justification for whether it has improved;
- an explanation of how each social change has contributed to the experience of mobility for
di

Watch the documentary Miss Representation by The Representation Project and answer the question please.

1.    What did you find persuasive and/or surprising about the films arguments regarding the consequences of womens misrepresentation in the media?

addresses at two of the subtopics below. 

a)    Women as news anchors and reporters
b)    Media coverage of female politicians in the USA
c)    Backstage media jobs (writing, editing, directing, producing, media ownership; representation on boards of directors)
d)    The relationship between capitalism, advertising, and media content

Miss Representation by The Representation Project

3.    LGBTQQIA identities
a.    What is heteronormativity?
b.    What does the concept the social construction of homosexuality and heterosexuality mean?
c.    Discuss three of the various identities in the label LGBTQQIA

I have a paper attached (HSE 330 Final turn in)

For this order I need an executive summary written and a Communications section
written.

And for the Executive summary
I have attached (HSE 330 Executive summary instructions)

For the communication section :
(What strategies would you use to tell people about the proposed amendment? Support with evidence)

These will be added to the entire paper.

The red markings on my attache paper are mainly reminders to me on what I have left to do.

The film Race: The Power of an Illusion episode 1 (attached) notes several common false assumptions about race. These include:

1- Racial categories represent scientifically definable biological differences between groups.
2- Every human has a specific and objectively correct racial identity.
3- Individuals cannot change their racial identity.
4- Every ethnic group has a specific and objectively correct racial identity. (e.g. Irish people are White).
5- Ethnic groups cannot change their racial identity.
6- Because racial identity includes both physical appearance and other, deeper, genetic qualities, a persons race can provide meaningful information about other aspects of their personality, such as athletic ability, musical aptitude or intelligence.

Please choose one of these misconceptions and address the following questions about it in a 250 500 word post.

1- Why is this belief incorrect?

2- How, in your opinion, might this misconception af

CSIS has just been given an audio file that they suspect is the voice of a terrorist. Knowing what you now know about spectral analysis of formants and harmonics, what can be said about the audio file? In other words, should we work for the defense or prosecution?

The final paper will be the culmination of all your work! For this final part you will be expected to write a 10 page paper (double-spaced, 12 pt font, 1 inch margins) that critically evaluates the topic youve chosen. Heres what I expect in this paper.
1) You need to have a clear introduction. In this introduction you have a couple of goals. You need to establish why the topic youre discussing is important and you need to provide a thesis statement (which may be more than one sentence). A thesis statement is basically a persuasion statement; it lets the reader know what position you are taking and what direction the paper will go in. Your introduction should also clearly lay out how the paper will develop. (e.g. In this paper I will first consider X, then discuss Y and then explore Z in relation to X and Y).

2) You need to have a well-developed, logically organized main body. This is the meat of the paper. This is where you lay out all your arguments, and keep in mind that t

Final Essay

This semester we have examined a variety of different ideas about what it means to live a good life.  Select two people/characters from the list below and, in an essay of 3-4 pages, compare and/or contrast what those individuals believe about the good life. You must base your argument upon what these individuals say and do. You should not choose two individuals from the same text.

Your comparison and/or contrast needs to be made on the basis of some criteria (probably two or three) that will allow your chosen individuals to be evaluated; these criteria should provide the structure for your essay.  You will need to provide direct quotations from the sources to support your analysis and a Works Cited page at the very end.

One approach might be to compare two individuals who have remarkably similar ideas about the good life, even though they are very different on the surface (in terms of age, race, historical period, etc.).  Another approac

Answer the question with 4-5 sentences.

1. Explain the steps in becoming a non-profit organization
2.Explain the fundraising roles of the Board of Directors of a nonprofit organization, the executive director, and volunteers.
3.What have you learned about what motivates supporters? What have you learned about those who give?
4.Develop an invitation to an event and try to remember the 17 items that Scott West told us to include in an invitation.
5.What goes into a good appeal letter to a donor?

Submit your responses to the discussion team's questions below. Please review the attached rubric and adhere to the following protocol:
Responses to each question should be a minimum of one short paragraph and a maximum of three paragraphs.
Address the questions as much as possible (don't let the discussion stray).
Try to use quotes from the readings that support your responses. Include page numbers when you do so.

1. In line with the theory of constructivism, Mitchell and Carpenter argue in favor of a norms-based approach to climate governance. In contrast, realists would argue that due to the anarchic international system, states must pursue an interest-based approach to safeguard their power and security. Historically, dominant powers have addressed various issue areas from a realist perspective. With regards to global climate governance today, should and can actors change their approach as the authors recommend? (Jasmine)

2. Michell and Carpenter refer to