I NEED A PROPOSAL AND an outline to match this final paper. Read attached instructions and let me know if you can also include a brief proposal paper and an outline and I will place an order for each additional paper (proposal and outline)
Must follow attached instructions
2-3 pages research proposal
1-2 pages outline
7-8 pages final paper
(11 pages total)
Your task is to write a paper thoroughly analyzing and critiquing a recent controversial court case. The goal of this assignment is for you to demonstrate your understanding of the concepts and theories discussed throughout this course through the analysis of a real-life case. Furthermore, this assignment gives you the opportunity to reflect upon the current state of the criminal justice system and relate current issues to the themes presented throughout the course.
Google the case of Palese v. Delaware State Lottery and read the actual case. Answer the question about whether or not Palese won his case. Discuss, in depth, why he won or why he did not win. (minimum 500 words). The important cases in this chapter are Trapani Construction Co. v. Elliott Group and Symons v. Heaton.
Section A--Summary
Articles of Impeachment against
President Richard M. Nixon
--Recommended by House Judiciary Committee
______
Three Articles of Impeachment
1) obstruction of justice
2) using powers of office of Pres. to violate
oath of office
3) refusal to produce data pursuant to subpeona duces tecum
___________________________________________________________________
Section B: Identify the role of the following in the Watergate Crisis and Saturday Night Massacre:
(*=very important role in Watergate Crisis)
*John Erlichman
*H.R. Haldeman
*John Mitchell
*John Dean
_______________________________________________________________
The topic is
"illegal Immigration with border enforcement and illegal activity at the border"
Cover Page
Abstract (no more than 150-250 words)
Introduction (include the specific research question and hypothesis which are presented at the end)
Literature Review Critical analysis is the key here
Methodology (This needs to more than a single sentence that states "I used qualitative methods". Take the time to explore what type of qualitative method you used. Content Analysis and Case Study are the two approaches that seem most likely for this course.
Analysis What does your research tell you? What are your conclusions??
Conclusion ensure you include what future research should cover that has not been explored.
Reference List
Technical Requirements
Your paper must be at a minimum of 10-12 pages (the Title and Reference pages do not count towards the minimum limit).
Scholarly and credible references should be used. A good rule of thumb is at l
1 consists of answering Critical Thinking Questions from CRIM 210 (Introduction to Criminology). Please answer the assigned questions in 3-6 paragraphs (4-6 sentences per paragraph) using proper A.P.A. writing techniques. Each writing assignment is scored out of 50 points. Outside . Please use Times New Roman 12 font and double space the document. The writing assignment will be graded on content, proper writing/grammar, A.P.A. format, and research. The professor will check for plagiarism, so please be conscious of plagiarism rules. Please be detailed and remember to support all claims within the document. Please refer to the Writing sample template and instructions for further information. Upload the assignment in a Microsoft Word document on Blackboard prior to the deadline.
Below is the grade rubric for each writing assignment along with a sample template:
Content (15 points): Did the student answer the questions in the proper context and provide sufficient evidence e
Read the Kaboom case. Brainstorm the impacts that Kaboom hopes to achieve. Starting with those outcomes in a logic model, fill out the other elements of the logic model. Mark elements of the logic model with L, S, R if that element is uniquely tied to either the Lead, Seed, or Rally components of Kabooms work. Please use the attached TEMPLATE for your logic model. I have also attached some two examples of the logic model
Hello Nunzio, I am back. I want to complete what we have started. My friend and I are working on our research which is about Consumer Protection. We will talk about 2 titles under Consumer Protection. The 2 titles are as follows: 1) Consumer privacy 2) Consumer credits. My part is Consumer privacy. My part you already wrote about last time for my presentation but now in the research I want you to use the same style in the attached file. (Title - Findings and Discussion - Conclusions and Recommendations - References)
The permission for this book is only 7 days, so you need to finish the book and complete the book review within 7 days. You need to download the book to the Adobe Digital Editions app to see it. I'm not sure which file you can open it in these files. If you cannot open it, please connect me immediately
Joanne is a 75 year old widow who survives on her husband's small pension. Joanne has become increasingly forgetful, and her family worries that she may have Alzheimer's disease. No physician has diagnosed her, however, and no court has ruled on her competence.
One day while she is out shopping Joanne stops by a store that is having a sale on pianos and enters into a 15 year installment contract to buy a grand piano. When the piano arrives the next day, Joanne seems confused and repeatedly asks the delivery person why a piano is being delivered. Joanne claims that she does not recall buying a piano. Explain whether the contract is void, voidable, or valid. Can Joanne avoid her contractual obligation to buy the piano? If so, how?
As always, remember to be respectful of each other, and please provide legal reasons for your answers.
Please don't copy any text from the Internet.
Topic:
Children Exposed to Domestic Violence Is it a Factor that Causes Harm?
Describe the ways children who witness domestic violence are impacted and include any
relationship domestic violence has to child abuse; identify what visitation, custody and safety
considerations should be made by the court.
Take a position related to the question asked in the topic description. Your position should be clearly stated based on the question asked and included on your abstract page.
Explain and support your position including at least five key areas (these may be different from your outline). Include the elements noted in the topic description and any other related information you believe is important to substantiate your position. Keep in mind that you are "selling" your position, backing it up with credible and academic research. Substantiation is very important in this position paper.