Fourth Amendment, Policies, and Society
Competencies Addressed in This Assignment
Competency 1: Describe how historical problems were managed in the evolution of the U.S. Constitution.
Competency 3: Explain the substantive and procedural interpretations of individual freedoms based on case analysis.
Competency 5: Communicate effectively in writing.
Assignment Description
Understanding the foundation of Fourth Amendment protections will help you understand how the interpretation and line-drawing has changed over time to reflect public policy and changes in society. Prepare a 3-page paper, citing a minimum of three academically verified references and addressing the following points:

Describe the type of search the framers of the Constitution prohibited through the Fourth Amendment.
Explain how prohibiting that type of search would address historical problems.
Fast-forwarding to today, you are a police officer getting ready to request a search warrant for a

please check example uploaded

Fourth Amendment in Motion
Competencies Addressed in This Discussion
Competency 3: Explain the substantive and procedural interpretations of individual freedoms based on case analysis.
Competency 4: Document philosophical underpinnings and public policy influences associated with U.S. Supreme Court decisions.
Competency 5: Communicate effectively in writing.
Introduction
Officer Tyler is standing close to a high school watching the foot traffic. Mike is walking to school, minding his own business. Mike appears older than he is, often being mistaken for someone in college. Officer Tyler is standing in Mike's path, looking directly at Mike. Mike needs to walk around the officer to continue on his way. Mike is nervous, since the officer is staring at him as he approaches. When Mike is a few feet away, Officer Tyler says, "Let me see some ID." Mike forgot his identification and tells the officer that he has no ID. The officer directs M

Competencies Addressed in This Assignment
Competency 3: Explain the substantive and procedural interpretation of individual freedoms based on case analysis.
Competency 4: Document philosophical underpinnings and public policy influences associated with U.S. Supreme Court decisions.
Competency 5: Communicate effectively in writing.
The exclusionary rule was created by judges, through case law, to prevent police misconduct. It prohibits the use of evidence obtained in violation of a person's constitutional rights. The exclusionary rule was established in the case of Weeks v. United States (1914) for federal application and was subsequently applied to the states in the 1961 case of Mapp v. Ohio.

You have been tasked with putting together a training presentation for a new class in the academy. The presentation will address the exclusionary rule, the impacts of the exclusionary rule, and exceptions to the exclusionary rule. In PowerPoint format, address the following:

Instructions
Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
In your textbook Business Law and the Legal Environment, read section 7.1 Purpose of Tort Laws and section 7.3 Negligence from Chapter 7, Introduction to Tort Law".
Listen to the National Public Radio presentation Its a Duel: Do Violent Video Games Affect Kids? You can also read the transcript on the web page.
Make note of at least two opposing viewpoints about how violent video games affect kids.
Navigate to the threaded discussion, and respond to the following:
Explain the elements of negligence and why the plaintiffs felt the defendants were negligent.
Why did the appeals court rule in favor of the defendants in this case?
In your opinion, do you believe the defendants owed a duty of care to the plaintiffs? Explain your viewpoint.
Your initial post is due by the end of the fourth day of the workshop.
Read and respond to at least two of your classmates postin

Instructions
Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
Read What is Summary Judgment? and the case summary Marri v. New York City Transit Authority (2013).
Navigate to the threaded discussion, and respond to the following:
In your own words, explain the summary judgment concept.
Summarize the relevant facts of Marri v. New York City Transit Authority (2013).
Explain why you agree or disagree with the legal ruling in Marri v. New York City Transit Authority (2013).
Your initial post is due by the end of the fourth day of the workshop.
Read and respond to at least two of your classmates postings, as well as all follow-up instructor questions directed to you, by the end of the workshop.
Your postings also should:
Be well developed by providing clear answers with evidence of critical thinking.
Add greater depth to the discussion by introducing new ideas.
Provide clarification to classmates questions and insight in

Review the following documents:
Reducing Crime through Intelligence-Led Policing
Intelligence-Led Policing:  The New Intelligence Architecture
Working towards Intelligence-Led Policing:  The Phoenix Police Department Intelligence Officer Program
The Benefit of Intelligence Officers

Describe the ways in which intelligence is critical to law enforcement agencies.  How are problem-oriented policing, offender-focused policing, and community policing utilized within intelligence-led policing?  Describe some of the key factors necessary for successful intelligence-led policing and why these elements are vital.  Include your thoughts on how intelligence-led policing effectively addresses crime prevention.

Guiding Question:  Is the single payer system effective? Would it be effective in the United States?


Instructions:

1. Watch the following video on the single-payer system in Canada
How Canada's Universal Health-Care System Works https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=heK471H-s1s


2. Write an Initial Post (250 - 300 words) taking the "CON" position.

3. Consider the following questions as you write your initial post:
How would doctors deal with patients?
What legal issues might develop?
Could doctors re-negotiate agreements with hospitals and the government?

4. Include at least one resource in your Initial Post.and cite it using APA Style

Tell me what are the advantages of knowing the law.
Will it help you personally and why.
What often happens when we are ignorant of our  legal rights?
You may take any of these questions or all of them and tell me why a study of the law is essential for all!

Please respond to the following:
The #1 will be a general response to what a classmate posted in regards to the initial posting. Please provide thoughts and/or question to Karina. The #2 and #3 are responses from classmate and professor asking questions pertaining to my initial posting.

The marketing of Oxycontin was based on the simple idea that Oxycontin could reduce chronic pain without posing a risk for abuse or addiction. Purdue made this claim to every doctor, stakeholder, and audience that they could. But how accurate was this claim and the specific arguments they were making? And in repeating this claim, what pieces of information were being overlooked or dismissed by Purdue? please reference Pain Killer-Barry Meier